Mexican Human Rights Commission (CNDH) neglects its duty to investigate human rights violations

In May and June 2020, ARTICLE 19 Mexico and Central America in collaboration with Signa_lab of ITESO and Aristegui Noticias, published two reports that – based on testimonies, technical analysis and evidence from WhatsApp chat conversations – affirm that Sanjuana Martinez, director of NOTIMEX, used public resources to attack journalists and employees that had worked for her, as well as other people critical of her management.

On June 4, ARTICLE 19 Mexico, along with the victims, filed a complaint with the National Human Rights Commission (Comisión Nacional de Derechos Humanos, CNDH). A month later, NOTIMEX staff informed ARTICLE 19 that Sanjuana Martínez had ordered the deletion of the WhatsApp chats “Los Avengers”, “SOS” and “Fiesta Halloween”, as well as any other communication that demonstrated her participation in plots against the journalists. For this reason, on July 8, we asked CNDH to order measures to safeguard the evidence.

On Saturday, February 27, 2021, ARTICLE 19 Mexico were notified by the CNDH of the conclusion of the complaint file CNDH/6/2020/4811/Q. More than eight months have passed since ARTICLE 19 Mexico filed a complaint with the CNDH on behalf of journalists and former employees whose rights had been violated by NOTIMEX.

The CNDH decided to conclude it…., considering the justifications and answers of the news agency sufficiently exculpatory, without taking into account the evidence and testimonies we provided. Moreover, the CNDH completely ignored the reports and findings of Signa_lab of ITESO, and the journalistic investigations of Aristegui Noticias. Most seriously, it concluded the complaint without contacting or interviewing all the complainants or even verifying NOTIMEX’s statements.

Finally, while the CNDH waited more than four months for NOTIMEX’s response, it decided not to wait for the completion of the investigation conducted by the Internal Control Organ of the news agency. For these reasons, ARTICLE 19 and the complainants request that the complaint be reconsidered and investigated impartially and in accordance with human rights.

The current irregularities of the CNDH decision…. can be summarized as follows:

1) Investigative omissions by not requesting more information from victims, witnesses, and other public authorities;

2) Failure to integrate information from the reports published jointly by Aristegui Noticias, Signa_lab and ARTICLE 19, or to request more information from the various participating institutions;

3) Providing unjustified extensions for NOTIMEX’s reply period;

4) Concluding the complaint by adopting NOTIMEX’s version as its own, without contrasting it with other existing evidence;

5) Failure to ensure that the required evidence was secure;

6) Reduction of human rights violations to a mere labour conflict between employees, and ignoring how the complainants rights of free expression were impinged upon;

7) Mistreatment of the victims, reflected in CNDH’s not notifying complainants of pertinent information, and providing misleading or biased information; and

8) Alexander Francisco Brewster Ramírez, the public servant who concluded the claim, resigned from his position last December after it became public that he had falsified his educational and professional history.

CNDH has become distant… from its role of defending, promoting and protecting human rights. The CNDH has shown no signs of real change during the current administration. What the problematic investigation and mistreatment of victims in the NOTIMEX case demonstrates is the institutional degradation of the CNDH. We regret to note that CNDH has retired into old patterns of co-optation and simulation. For this reason, the objectivity and impartiality of this human rights protection institution is in question, since its actions during this investigation lacked the commitment, thoroughness, and professionalism that is demanded by the investigation of human rights violations.

For the above reasons, ARTICLE 19 Mexico and Central America request:

– That CNDH fulfil its obligations by reconsidering the complaint and investigating it impartially and in accordance with human rights principles.

– That the Congress intervene and summon Rosario Piedra Ibarra, head of the CNDH, to appear before it in order to guarantee that the CNDH is able to fulfil its obligations autonomously.

The post Mexican Human Rights Commission (CNDH) neglects its duty to investigate human rights violations appeared first on IFEX.

Source: MEDIA FEED

HRNJ-UG Admin

Human Rights Network for Journalists-Uganda (HRNJ-Uganda) is a network of human rights journalists in Uganda working towards enhancing the promotion, protection and respect of human rights through defending and building the capacities of journalists, to effectively exercise their constitutional rights and fundamental freedoms for collective campaigning through the media.

Related posts

Top